Драйвер для intel hd graphics 520

Porteus

• Print view

• 1

kalo86 Samurai
Posts: 163 Joined: 28 Mar 2011, 18:04 Location: Italy

Intel HD Graphics 520 driver with OpenGL support

• Quote

Post #1 by kalo86 » 01 Jun 2020, 18:15

I have a question: why the Intel HD Graphics card 520 on my laptop has an OpenGL version 3.0 while on Windows it reaches OpenGL 4.5?

I need support for OpenGL 4.x in order to run a specific software and I wonder if there is a way to make it possible in Porteus 5.0rc1 (x86_64).

I hope to read your answers.

Best regards,
kalo86

donald Full of knowledge
Posts: 1880 Joined: 17 Jun 2013, 13:17 Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 XFCE 32bit Location: Germany

Intel HD Graphics 520 driver with OpenGL support

• Quote

Post #2 by donald » 02 Jun 2020, 02:58

The issue is probably that you are getting compatibility profile when you really want a core profile.
The driver only supports OpenGL 4.3 when in core profile mode, and 3.0 in compatibility mode.

You could try to set a environment variable like MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=4.3
to get it working.
https://www.mesa3d.org/envvars.html

kalo86 Samurai
Posts: 163 Joined: 28 Mar 2011, 18:04 Location: Italy

Intel HD Graphics 520 driver with OpenGL support

• Quote

Post #3 by kalo86 » 02 Jun 2020, 06:19

I suppose that I have to change the variable.
What is the best way to do it? Overwrite the .bashrc file at reboot? Can I do this on the rootcopy folder or do I need a dedicated module?

Для каких задач подойдёт Intel HD 520?

В первую очередь — это нетребовательная офисная работа в приложениях или сёрфинг интернета. Если вы хотите использовать компьютер именно для этих задач, вам отлично хватит производительности встроенной графики, поэтому покупка внешней видеокарты будет глупой затеей.

Также интегрированные решения отлично себя чувствуют в компьютерах, работающих в качестве домашних кинотеатров. HD 520 обладает достаточной производительностью для просмотра фильмов или видео во всех разрешениях, включая UltraHD (4K). Для контента более высокого разрешения данной видеокарты может не хватить.

В игровом плане всё не особо хорошо, среди современных проектов немного какие игры пойдут на Intel HD 520, и это при полной поддержке DirectX 12. Причина этому — ужасная производительность чипа в играх. Хотя инди-проекты должны запускаться нормально, ведь большая часть из них не блещет графическими наворотами.

Со старыми играми всё намного лучше, они будут работать на высоких настройках графики с хорошей частотой кадров.

Хоть Intel HD 520 и можно использовать в специализированных программах для обработки графики или видео. Его производительность лишь ненамного увеличит скорость работы такого ПО. Для профессионального софта лучше использовать что-либо посерьёзней.

Оверклокерские возможности у видеокарты нулевые, разгон графического чипа отсутствует. Единственное, что остаётся у пользователей HD 520 для небольшого поднятия производительности — возможность разгона оперативной памяти.

Prerequisites

• A Nintendo Switch vulnerable to the fusée gelée RCM exploit – Visit https://damota.me/ssnc/checker and test your Switch’s serial number
• An SD card with at least 30 GB of free space (an almost empty 32GB card will work)
• A USB-C to USB-A or USB-C to USB-C Cable to connect your Switch to your computer – Download TegraRcmGUI_v2.6_Installer.msi – Download hekate_ctcaer_X.X.X_Nyx_X.X.X.zip – Download both atmosphere-X.X.X-master-XXXXXXXX+hbl-X.X.X+hbmenu-X.X.X.zip and fusee.bin – Download Lockpick_RCM.bin – Download nxdumptool.nro – Download nxDumpMerger_Windows.zip – Download TegraExplorer.bin – If your computer has one built-in, you can use that <– We highly recommend one like this, but you could use any of the methods outlined here

%YUZU_DIR% is the home directory for yuzu on your computer:

Intel HD Graphics 520

Still struggling with my new T460 thinkpad.
I have an Intel Core i7-6600U at 2.60GHz with the HD Graphics 520 chipset.

As far as I know skylake’s graphics architecture is not supported in FreeBSD 10.3
Is this support will happen any time soon ?

I installed the scfb driver to have a non accelerated working X session.
Here is my xorg.conf file : http://pastebin.com/5aDyBfF3

The X server start successfully but I cannot have other resolution than 640×480!

Am I missing something?

SirDice

Administrator

Reaction score: 12,679
Messages: 39,278

• May 4, 2016

• #2

wblock@

Beastie Himself

Reaction score: 3,739
Messages: 13,851

• May 4, 2016

• #3

No idea if this works on 10-STABLE, but it does work in -CURRENT:

Boot into the loader shell, option 3 at the boot prompt in -CURRENT. Use gop list to see the available modes, then gop set [i]n[/i] to choose a mode. The scfb driver will use that mode.

Nobody has been able to tell me how to set a mode without user interaction. If you figure that out, please let me know.

wheelcomplex yin

New Member

Reaction score: 2
Messages: 2

• Aug 17, 2016

• #4

I’m using follow xorg.conf with scfb + slim + xfce4, it work fine for me(1920 x 1080 Resolution), without user interaction.

No idea if this works on 10-STABLE, but it does work in -CURRENT:

Boot into the loader shell, option 3 at the boot prompt in -CURRENT. Use gop list to see the available modes, then gop set [I]n[/I] to choose a mode. The scfb driver will use that mode.

Nobody has been able to tell me how to set a mode without user interaction. If you figure that out, please let me know.

Julien Picalausa

New Member

Reaction score: 5
Messages: 2

• Aug 22, 2016

• #5

No idea if this works on 10-STABLE, but it does work in -CURRENT:

Boot into the loader shell, option 3 at the boot prompt in -CURRENT. Use gop list to see the available modes, then gop set [I]n[/I] to choose a mode. The scfb driver will use that mode.

Nobody has been able to tell me how to set a mode without user interaction. If you figure that out, please let me know.

I found this post a while back and it was exactly the answer I was looking for. But I did find a way to set the mode via loader.conf, so I thought I’d contribute back.

wblock@

Beastie Himself

Reaction score: 3,739
Messages: 13,851

• Aug 23, 2016

• #6

abishai

Aspiring Daemon

Reaction score: 186
Messages: 769

• Aug 23, 2016

• #7

Proper resolution is autodetected on my Dell XPS13 when booted with UEFI. I have only hint to enable scfb, not full xorg.conf layout.

I don’t think support for skylake is coming soon, I have drm46 branch in boot environment and it is in rather alpha state and probably can’t do more than 2D and even in 2D it have artifacts if compositor enabled. Resume is broken as well, however brightness can be set with xset , scfb lacks this support.

sHagen

New Member

Reaction score: 3
Messages: 12

• Nov 24, 2016

• #8

Hmm, when I look at the freebsd-ports-graphics repository and the xserver-next branch, then I can see that the intel driver got updated a while ago.
Repo: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-graphics/tree/xserver-next/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel

It is fetching and compiling xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20160614 which already has skylake support. I also found my device ID in there (Lenovo x260, Intel HD 520).

The interesting bit is that it is compiling just fine on my 11-RELEASE machine. However, there’s no change in system behavior after installing (make install) it. X is still launching via framebuffer device and forcing driver "intel" will result in "(EE) no screens found".

So there’s a solution in the sky, but I can’t reach it

Also, trueos (former pc-bsd) — which is based on freebsd-current — already comes with skylake support als also with the "2.99.917.20160614" intel driver. So this seems to be the right thing. But the trueos patches do not compile on FreeBSD (11-RELEASE).